Can Police Refuse to Enforce a Law

A person`s first right is the right not to speak to the police. If they say they will come in any way, ask to see their arrest warrant. If they do not have an arrest warrant, they do not have the right to enter. Telling the public that they will not enforce a valid law is not the best or right approach to take on an issue that is so important to the people of this state. “I don`t think there should be law enforcement agencies that should try to tell people to sit at home and not take vacations,” Carpinelli said earlier this month. “I believe in security, but I think we should be governed by the people themselves.” If the police want to run into a person on the street and seem to be talking to a person, the person doesn`t have to stop. Unless the police have a reasonable belief that a person has been involved in a crime, have an arrest warrant, or find that the person is committing a crime, they do not have the power to arrest and talk to the person. Most peace officers have jurisdiction throughout the state, but many have limited powers outside of their political divisions. Some peace officers require a special permit to carry firearms. Powers are often limited to the performance of the main duties of peace officers (usually the application of certain laws in their political subdivision); However, most have the power to be arrested anywhere in the state for any public crime[11] that poses an imminent danger to a person or property. Sometimes a decision needs to be made at the moment, and there are cases where cooperation might be more appropriate. For example, if a neighbor`s car was stolen and the police want to ask you if you saw something, and you want to help your neighbor and you have nothing to do with the theft of his car, then you may want to help your neighbor by answering a few reasonable questions about everything you saw on the street at the time of the theft. Although the public servant has the legal right to charge the citizen, he should think about what this case will look like when it goes to court.

The credibility of the official is called into question after the circumstances of the case have been read in court. As a general rule, the citizen`s disgusting behavior, when recalled later, pales in comparison to what the court might find to be an abuse of authority on the part of the police officer. Agents must be objective and treat everyone equally, regardless of the behavior displayed. When confronted with obnoxious citizens, officials must strive to remain impassive, angry and calm. The use of discretion as a tool to impose outdated laws and statutes on a citizen should be avoided in the interests of the public servant, the agency and society. These laws prohibit discriminatory treatment, including misconduct, due to disability in virtually all law enforcement agencies and activities. These activities include, but are not limited to, the questioning of witnesses, the provision of emergency services, law enforcement, the handling of citizens` complaints, and the arrest, reservation and detention of suspects. These laws also prohibit retaliation for filing a complaint with the Department of Justice or participating in the investigation. What remedies are available under these laws? If applicable, the DOJ may seek individual redress for the victim(s) in addition to changes to the law enforcement agency`s policies and procedures. Individuals have a private right of action under the ADA and Section 504; You may bring a private lawsuit for violation of these statutes.

You do not need to exhaust your administrative remedies by first filing a complaint with the DOJ. If these legal provisions, which were passed and adopted by more than 60% of voters, are not enforced or perhaps simply ignored, what was the point of putting them on the ballot in the first place? Cuomo did not name any of the sheriffs, but one sheriff who said he would not enforce those laws was Mike Carpinelli of Lewis County. Being arrested by the police is a stressful experience that can quickly go wrong. Here we describe what the law requires and also propose strategies to deal with clashes with the police. We want to make it clear that the burden of de-escalation does not fall on individuals – it falls on the police. However, you cannot assume that officers will behave in a way that protects your safety or respects your rights, even after you have asserted them. You may be able to reduce the risk to yourself by remaining calm and not showing hostility to officers. The truth is that there are situations where people have done everything they can to calm an officer, but have still been injured or killed. These officers were elected or hired to enforce the laws of that city, county, state, and the country as a whole. It is important not to insult or upset police officers in any way; they are there to do their job, and there is no point in driving them crazy. However, if they do exist, a person may want to ask what the police want to talk about.

If they are there to tell the person something else, like a family member who has died, then most likely the person will want to have this conversation with them. However, if law enforcement doesn`t tell someone why they`re there, or if they say they`re there to question the person about a crime, then it`s best to politely refuse. Law enforcement officers have enormous discretion to decide which laws to enforce and when. While discretion allows them to decide when and what to investigate, problems arise when an agent`s decision can be questionable. Officials often refer to “ways and means of action” to explain selective enforcement, resulting in “legal” punishment for bad behavior in a way that may not be justified. An example is best used to illustrate this way of thinking. An example of urgent circumstances could be when law enforcement hears someone crying in the trunk of the car and is not aware of a crime, does not have the consent of the owner and does not have a search warrant, but can look in the trunk to see why someone is crying in the car to make sure something illegal does not happen, like a kidnapping. If there are signs that the police are investigating the person in question for a possible crime, you should seriously consider hiring and talking to a lawyer. The police are not perfect and sometimes make the wrong arrest decisions. All statements made to the police can be used against a person. When in doubt, keep your mouth shut and don`t talk to the police.

It is a crime for one or more persons who are acting intentionally under the guise of the law to deprive another person of any rights protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States or to conspire. .